TenantOne shield logoTenantOne
For organizations

One tenant baseline. Three stakeholder views.

TenantOne gives leadership, Google Workspace administrators and security teams a shared evidence base for deciding what to fix, fund and govern.

Try the demoSee the executive report
Shared operating pictureAvailable now
01

Leadership

Priorities and investment

02

Administration

Evidence and remediation

03

Security

Exposure and governance

79
Automated checks
From the current product registry
13
Coverage categories
With explicit data boundaries
4
Decision areas
A smaller executive operating view
Read-only
Core connection
Recommendations without tenant changes
Jobs to be done

The same evidence, shaped for each responsibility.

Stakeholders do not need identical screens. They need a consistent source of truth that answers the decision in front of them.

CIO and IT leadership

Set investment priorities

Connect material risk, governance gaps and estimated savings in one decision-ready view.

  • Separate urgent exposure from routine hygiene.
  • Review assumptions behind savings estimates.
  • Align remediation with ownership and business impact.

Workspace administrators

Turn findings into a workable backlog

Move from scattered Admin console observations to a prioritized list with affected objects and recommended actions.

  • See check-level evidence and affected accounts or resources.
  • Distinguish unavailable coverage from a passing control.
  • Use the assessment as a baseline for targeted remediation.

Security and governance

Make exposure reviewable

Bring identity, third-party access, sharing and monitoring signals into a common risk language.

  • Review findings by severity and assessment area.
  • Use framework relevance as context, not certification.
  • Document accepted risk and follow-up decisions outside the score.
Evidence workflow

Make the finding reviewable before making it actionable.

TenantOne keeps summary metrics connected to check logic, affected objects and the coverage available for that assessment.

Evidence first

A defensible baseline includes

  • The observed configuration or activity signal behind each finding.
  • The check description, severity and recommended administrative action.
  • A clear indication when optional Drive, Shared Drive or Chrome data was unavailable.
  • Cost estimates that retain administrator-entered pricing assumptions.
  • Executive summaries that support prioritization without hiding technical detail.
30 / 60 / 90 operating model

Turn a point-in-time assessment into a management cadence.

This is a practical team operating model, not a claim of automated scheduling. Your team chooses when to initiate each reassessment.

30Day 30

Establish the baseline

Connect the tenant, confirm available coverage and agree which findings require immediate ownership.

Working output

Evidence-backed priority map

60Day 60

Work the decisions

Validate affected objects, remove false assumptions and sequence remediation alongside cost opportunities.

Working output

Owned remediation backlog

90Day 90

Reassess the posture

Initiate a new assessment, compare the evidence and decide which residual risks need further action.

Working output

Progress and residual-risk review

Designed for responsible access

Keep administrators in control of the connection.

Core collection is read-only. Optional metadata coverage is authorized separately, and missing data remains visible in the assessment.

Review trust details
Start with evidence

Give every stakeholder the same starting evidence.

Explore the synthetic tenant, review the executive report and decide whether the assessment fits your organization’s operating model.

Try the demoTalk to us